.jpg)
In July 2016, a federal judge ruled that a class action lawsuit filed by people with disabilities could proceed against the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS). The ruling was not symbolic. It was a legal determination that the claims — representing roughly 5,000 disabled Minnesotans deprived of more than $1 billion in Medicaid services — were serious enough to merit adjudication.
The lawsuit alleged that Minnesota’s Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) Waiver program, administered by DHS, had been "mismanaged" for years. Plaintiffs described being left on waiting lists for up to 15 years, incorrectly told they were ineligible, or denied services that federal Medicaid law requires states to provide.
However, those were the plaintiffs the courts considered. There were “physically disabled” victims openly enrolled, funded, and active in the health insurance program who required a level of care typically provided in a nursing home or assisted living facility, yet were not receiving the medical treatment that was being billed and reported. They were illegally forbidden from self-directed consumer care (including firing DHS fraudsters), despite certification and enrollment, and were illegally excluded from all budget-related medical decisions for daily care—resulting in lifelong medical injury, including but not limited to a 77% loss of lower extremity function requiring surgical intervention.
These injuries were caused by intentional, malicious, neglectful, abusive, chronic, daily abuse over many years, without any statewide intervention or protection, while the state received funding on the victim’s behalf for twenty-three years. During that time, the victim had access to only "one" related medical treatment within the state of Minnesota. Reports were made regularly beginning in 2003.
Like the families in Just Plain Wrong, the victim and family were met with brutal retaliation that rose to the level of separation; false allegations of mental illness made by DHS social workers and public health nurses, written as formal diagnoses; state-mandated drug use under threat of benefit termination without proper medical assessment; false commitments; false allegations of child abuse, drug addiction, and alcohol addiction; nonstop incarcerations; state-coordinated break-ins and property destruction; illegal surveillance; slander and libel; systematic alterations of driving records; consumer credit destruction; constant, systematically forced exposure to high-concentration sexual predator neighborhoods; and multiple periods of trafficking connected to criminal retaliatory housing attacks.
Additional tactics included retaliatory federal theft of a HUD voucher, multiple deaths, forced permanent disability, systematic barring from national employment, vehicle use, and housing; repossession of everything the victim owned; illegal access to court records; identity smearing; and loss of prime working years, totally destruction of the family unit and all its members to the third generation and to name only a few retaliatory acts against victim civil whistleblowers.
All of this, only for the victim to successfully escape the state of Minnesota in 2020, connect to medical treatment for the first time, and prove their case by returning to the workforce in under one year after escape, just as they had been part of the workforce prior to the onset of illness—at which point they were basically systematically kidnapped by DHS to receive access to medical treatment one time and face retaliation for having successfully connected to that treatment. Their case being, that the Minnesota Department of Human Services, with its many tentacles in just about every institution and program in the state (to control victims and narratives) including legal aids and courts, continues to "create" and "maintain" disabled persons through illegal and criminal brutal force to feed its Medicaid waiver programs. Nothing but location and modus operandi has changed since The Just Plain Wrong report.
"Not one investigation has been conducted, for complaint history stretching multi-decades."
Excerpts:
(1) "In addition to practices of the facility, the Ombudsman looked at all of the various agencies who had protective obligations for these clients or responsibility to serve as a checks and balances over the actions of the program. For a variety of reasons, those checks and balances failed to protect the clients served by the program or turned a blind eye to the problem. It was not until the Ombudsman’s Office started raising red flags that actions to identify and correct the problems began. The Minnesota Office of Health Facility Complaints, or OHFC, issued a report with ninety-nine pages of problems and citations. The DHS Licensing Division followed with a report outlining additional rule violations."
(2) "The words and phrasing used by all parties connected to METO
were similar or identical, indicating a problem often referred to as “group
think,” where the message is so ingrained and the leadership philosophy so
strong that independent thinking is neither utilized nor tolerated among
members of the group. This puts the facility at risk of no one seeing potential
problems within the program or the corrective measures that might be needed.
The language takes on the characteristics of a 'mantra.'”
Commissioner Emily Johnson Piper attempted to stop the class action lawsuit. The judge rejected DHS’s attempt to deflect responsibility onto counties, finding instead that DHS controlled the program in dispute.
This case did not arise in isolation. It came after METO, after the Just Plain Wrong report, after decades of documented failures in Minnesota’s care systems — failures that had already resulted in investigations, findings of non-compliance, and legal mandates intended to prevent exactly this outcome and while under the jurisdiction of Jensen v. Minnesota Department of Human Services. Yet the same patterns persisted. How can it be considered anything other than what it appears to be and what the evidence and testimony would prove it were only collected: Racketeering.
The Post-METO Reality
METO and subsequent investigations were supposed to mark a turning point: a recognition that Minnesota’s systems had caused harm and required structural correction. Instead, the post-METO era reveals a different reality — one of continuity rather than reform.
Despite the existence of federal funds specifically allocated for community-based care, DHS was alleged to have allowed those funds to go unspent, reverting back into the general fund rather than reaching the people for whom they were intended. As plaintiffs’ counsel stated at the time, the state had been receiving the money for decades — and simply was not using it to deliver services. This is not a technical failure. It is a systemic one.
When disabled individuals are denied services that allow them to live independently, the consequence is not neutral. It is institutionalization by default, medical deterioration, loss of housing, and the erosion of basic autonomy. The waiver system exists precisely to prevent that outcome. When it fails, the harm is foreseeable and ongoing.
Leadership Without Accountability
Emily Johnson Piper became Commissioner of DHS in 2015 — the same year this lawsuit was filed. During her tenure, DHS did not resolve the underlying structural failures alleged in the case. Instead, the department continued to resist accountability, attempted to dismiss the claims, and only moved toward compliance under judicial pressure. This period was marked by a familiar institutional response:
-
Delay rather than correction
-
Procedural defenses rather than substantive fixes
-
Public messaging emphasizing reform while lived outcomes remained unchanged
Even when courts, ombudsmen, and plaintiffs documented failures, the system did not self-correct. It responded only after being caught, and even then, primarily through negotiated settlements rather than transparent admission of wrongdoing or individual accountability. The result is a culture where leadership transitions occur without reckoning, while the people harmed by policy failures are left without remedy.
The Pattern, Not the Exception
What this lawsuit illustrates is not an aberration, but a pattern:
-
Federal money allocated for disabled Minnesotans exists
-
Programs are legally mandated
-
Oversight mechanisms are in place on paper
-
And yet, thousands of people are denied services for years
When complaints are raised, they are absorbed by the same administrative structures that created the harm. When legal action is taken, the state defends itself aggressively. When settlements occur, they are framed as progress — even as the underlying culture remains intact. This is not how a functioning system of checks and balances operates. It is how institutional non-compliance is normalized.
Why This Still Matters
The lawsuit was filed in 2015. The judge’s ruling came in 2016. Nearly a decade later, Minnesota is again facing headlines about fraud, failures in oversight, and vulnerable people falling through the cracks. That is not coincidence. The conditions that allowed METO, that necessitated Just Plain Wrong, that gave rise to Jensen v. DHS, and that produced this 2016 ruling were never fully dismantled. They were managed, rebranded, and absorbed — not corrected. Until the state confronts this history honestly — including the role of leadership during these periods — Minnesota will continue to cycle through scandal, settlement, and silence.
Bearing Witness
The public is often shown headlines about fraud. What it is rarely shown is the long record demonstrating that the most persistent victims are disabled Minnesotans whose services were withheld, delayed, or denied altogether — not because the law was unclear, but because the system refused to comply. Bearing Witness exists to place those records back into view. Not as spectacle. Not as politics. But as fact.
.png)
.jpg)
Post a Comment