The State of Minnesota, Inc. (c.1858) operates as a criminal enterprise of organized crime run on fraud. Mr. Hudson is completely correct in his accusation. Within the Minnesota Department of Human Services, there exists what can only be described as a “systematic racketeering pyramid.” There is absolutely no question. This is what I have reported since roughly 2007.

 

I hope he will not be beguiled into becoming one of the perpetrators—assisting criminals by suppressing factual information. We can prove these allegations, we have the evidence to prove them, and we have taken legal action against DHS for criminal acts, including racketeering behaviors such as fraud and money laundering in “waivered services” in the recent past. The evidence required to uncover fraud and prevent future fraud lies with the program participants—yet the state’s criminal enterprise silences them and hides their identity. DHS policy forbids them from reporting fraud at all.

 

In my twenty-two years of ongoing experience, this criminal operation within DHS has been directed by the Democratic Party—until this recent attack on the Somali community, which is being driven by the Republican Party. Individuals have been compensated for their loyalty to the Democratic Party, the party that champions welfare programs, especially healthcare. The Somali community has likewise been compensated for its loyalty, whether negligently or intentionally—that is simply what has occurred.

 

But this compensation does not address the core racketeering issue. The persecution or prosecution of the Somali community will do nothing to identify or prevent fraud in DHS waiver services. In fact, this witch hunt is intentionally providing cover for the true criminal enterprise—the one from whom the Somali community received only small payments. From my perspective, if this is not corrected and the actual criminals are not brought forward, Attorney General Joe Thompson and Minnesota House Representative Walter Hudson become part of the state’s criminal enterprise and complicit in ongoing racketeering.

 

This is why I have made this public claim—with evidence. It gives them the opportunity to pursue the correct offenders or publicly demonstrate complicity by failing to do so. Unfortunately, this has become my life’s work, and I will not stop until I am formally justified by this state.

 

I take issue with the claim of “benevolence”—it is a red flag for a state-sanctioned cover-up. There is no benevolence involved. This is not benevolence; this is a federal mandate resulting from the settlement DHS established after a class-action lawsuit uncovered one instance of what may be the most gruesome, vicious and ongoing government abuse of a population in U.S. history since enslavement—and the state’s unrepentant continuation of that abuse, in violation of the very settlement agreement it forged.

 

Answer To Representative Walter Hudson’s Question

Class action settlement Jensen v. Minnesota Department of Human Services (c. 2009) found 99 pages of compliance violations, physical and psychological abuse, and financial exploitation of disabled individuals in Minnesota-operated facilities. This led to the requirement that DHS allow people to receive care in alternative settings, which is how these Medicaid Waiver housing programs were created.

 

“They should never be shut down.” The comment is as volatile as proclaiming African Americans should be returned to cotton plantations. This freedom to escape institutional abuse inside Minnesota facilities has been fought and won. And like systematic racism in the USA which followed the 14th Amendment—not fully realized because fraud is still rampant, victims remain brutally suppressed by retaliation, the perpetrators (whom are generally white democrats employed directly within DHS and other government bodies) identities remain hidden and no DHS power has been altered as result of decades of legal actions and public, formal whistleblowing about the conduct of Minnesota Department of Human Services internal workforce. "No face, No Case."

 

Anyone on an oversight committee that doesn’t know this background—or feigns ignorance, is a danger to vulnerable people. (1) Why are we chronically making decisions without due diligence in Minnesota government?

 

(2) Why are we suggesting further organized attack of the victims through settlement reversal program closures without a court trial—who we've already failed by ignoring injurious internal DHS abuse, fraud and neglect?

 

(3) Why are we attacking people (Africans) who received payments but not the entity and individuals whom approved bogus applications, bogus billable hours & units, and rendered fraudulent payments to those Africans, when these individuals are required by DHS regulations to communicate with program participants?

 

All that is proven by delivery of these fraudulent payments is that DHS remains abusive, neglectful and fraudulent to Minnesota's disabled population irrespective of the history of class action lawsuits against them ordering an end to this conduct. A simple call to the participant by DHS (which they're already required to do) would have confirmed that there was no participant and/or no service was delivered—stopping fraud in it's tracks and giving legal what it needs to prosecute the "attempt" of fraud.

 

(4) If the DHS workforce is not managing healthcare cases for the payroll they're receiving to do just that, why do they retain authority to receive and manage the program money and (4a.) what are they doing with the money right? They're holding it until it rolls into general funding and paying off "loyal friends who promote and protect the culture" at the cost of disabled lives.

 

(5) Does the legal or illegal operation of DHS's workforce not ultimately fall on the shoulders of its commissioners, deputies and the states governors who appoint this executive body? (6) Where is their accountability to the workforce, contracted programs, the citizens participating in their programs and the tax payers laboring to resolve issues of poverty and medical disability? (7) Who is receiving employment income to oversee these government offices?

 

There is something positively rotten about the absence of answers to these questions in the media by those who claim to be resolving fraud and protecting tax-payers. There is something equally as rotten about the absence of communicated intention to protect the disabled victims of these criminal acts whom are losing their bodies and their lives. It smells like a state culture, "Minnesota Nice" if you will—that regards the presence of disability as a crime committed by undesirable and disposable human beings, and thus goes about conducting business and controlling narratives in a manner which is fatally detrimental to them and all that is attached to them, such as dependents.

 

What is interesting about this perception on current fraud matters is the abundant historical evidence of Minnesota's government making such claims resulting in both U.S. domestic wars and an entity with DHS which has a history of sterilization of disabled persons. Which readers can find under the culture tab of this website.

 

so my question is this: are we resolving the issue of perverse fraud within Minnesota government right now or are we asking the public to play along as we do what we've always done?

 

I'm not sure, so I didn't send evidence to through the GOP whistleblower portal. You'll find some below.